<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome Security, Privacy, Technical Issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cow.neondragon.net/index.php/google-chrome-security-privacy-technical-issues/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cow.neondragon.net/index.php/google-chrome-security-privacy-technical-issues</link>
	<description>Helping you to get the most out of modern technology and communications since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:48:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: film fan</title>
		<link>http://cow.neondragon.net/index.php/google-chrome-security-privacy-technical-issues/comment-page-1#comment-3742</link>
		<dc:creator>film fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 23:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cow.neondragon.net/?p=3575#comment-3742</guid>
		<description>there are so many advantages and features with Chrome, such as it&#039;s speed, for example; now if only they would take care it&#039;s quirky cookie management...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are so many advantages and features with Chrome, such as it&#8217;s speed, for example; now if only they would take care it&#8217;s quirky cookie management&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reflection.js in Google Chrome &#124; Cow's Blog</title>
		<link>http://cow.neondragon.net/index.php/google-chrome-security-privacy-technical-issues/comment-page-1#comment-3681</link>
		<dc:creator>Reflection.js in Google Chrome &#124; Cow's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cow.neondragon.net/?p=3575#comment-3681</guid>
		<description>[...] over the last few days with emails regarding Reflection.js not working correctly in the IMO rather buggy Google Chrome browser. Thanks for everyone who reported the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] over the last few days with emails regarding Reflection.js not working correctly in the IMO rather buggy Google Chrome browser. Thanks for everyone who reported the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Kendal</title>
		<link>http://cow.neondragon.net/index.php/google-chrome-security-privacy-technical-issues/comment-page-1#comment-3675</link>
		<dc:creator>David Kendal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 21:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cow.neondragon.net/?p=3575#comment-3675</guid>
		<description>I agree. My initial reaction to the release was: Why reinvent the wheel? Particularly when it&#039;s already been invented so many times. Firefox is the industry standard.

I&#039;m sorry, we have another contender for the post of new Evil Empire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. My initial reaction to the release was: Why reinvent the wheel? Particularly when it&#8217;s already been invented so many times. Firefox is the industry standard.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, we have another contender for the post of new Evil Empire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MX3 Design</title>
		<link>http://cow.neondragon.net/index.php/google-chrome-security-privacy-technical-issues/comment-page-1#comment-3674</link>
		<dc:creator>MX3 Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cow.neondragon.net/?p=3575#comment-3674</guid>
		<description>I think there&#039;s every reason to be harsh. The general (albeit &#039;beta&#039;) release of Chrome is way too early, this product is only at beta test stage and should only have been released to beta testers. There are numerous major bugs.

Google is in danger here of acquiring a reputation similar to MS for rolling out under developed and malfunctioning products. 

In brief this ‘browser’ is like a bad version of Safari with some IE6 bugs thrown in for good measure. All it currently succeeds in doing is creating a lot of extra work for developers. This is not a release build.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s every reason to be harsh. The general (albeit &#8216;beta&#8217;) release of Chrome is way too early, this product is only at beta test stage and should only have been released to beta testers. There are numerous major bugs.</p>
<p>Google is in danger here of acquiring a reputation similar to MS for rolling out under developed and malfunctioning products. </p>
<p>In brief this ‘browser’ is like a bad version of Safari with some IE6 bugs thrown in for good measure. All it currently succeeds in doing is creating a lot of extra work for developers. This is not a release build.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://cow.neondragon.net/index.php/google-chrome-security-privacy-technical-issues/comment-page-1#comment-3673</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cow.neondragon.net/?p=3575#comment-3673</guid>
		<description>I definitely agree.  Let&#039;s wait to see how the whole thing shakes out over time.  It&#039;s possible the negative PR will get them to make more changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely agree.  Let&#8217;s wait to see how the whole thing shakes out over time.  It&#8217;s possible the negative PR will get them to make more changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

