Archive for the 'Music' Category

We7 – Free browser-based music streaming alternative to Spotify

November 15th, 2009

Clave de sol
Creative Commons License photo: wakalani

we7 is a free browser-based music streaming website. It’s not as well known as rival Spotify which has had a lot of press lately and has also been integrated into mobile network 3’s latest offering. But with 2.5 million UK users (compared to Spotify’s 2.7million), we7 looks like it could potentially be a challenger to Spotify.

Whilst Spotify is invite-only, we7 doesn’t require an invite, doesn’t require you to register and doesn’t require you to download any programmes on your computer. All you need is a web browser to stream the high quality 192kbps music.

Continue Reading »

3 launches Spotify music phone and tariff

October 28th, 2009

headphones
Creative Commons License photo: e-magic

Mobile network 3 is to offer a Spotify tariff from next month. The tariff will offer customers a HTC Hero Android smartphone with a bundled subscription to the Spotify Premium music streaming service. The tariff will make 6 million tracks available to customers to stream at any time, without adverts.

How much does it cost?

You will need to buy the HTC Hero phone for £99 and then pay £35 a month (24 month contract). This brings the total cost of ownership to £939 over the 24 months (equivalent to £39.13 per month).

Continue Reading »

Discover new music with Spotify & Twitter real-time search

September 6th, 2009

Free music streaming service Spotify (previously covered) recently implemented a “Post to Twitter” feature. It’s a great way to share your favourite tracks with your friends.

And now: using the new tool I’ve developed called Twittify (Twitter + Spotify), it’s a great way to discover new music too.

Twittify

How does it work?

It uses Twitter’s real-time search to retrieve information about what people are listening to. You can search by Twitter user, artist, etc. It then uses Spotify to play that track.

Disco light - disco ball
Creative Commons License photo: marfis75

The result: You discover new music and songs that other people are currently listening to around the world.

How do I update the track list?

Twittify does this automatically once a minute – you don’t need to do anything at all.

How do I share music?

In Spotify, right-click on a song and click “Share to > Twitter”.

How was it built?

Javascript which interfaces with Twitter Search and the Spotify Application.

Is this new?

In May, I posted a proof of concept. This new version looks better and integrates with Spotify’s new “Share to Twitter” feature.

Try it out…

Go to the Twittify webpage.

Got questions or comments?

Please drop us a message in the blog comments below – I’d love to hear from you.

Music streaming to be incorporated into Top 40?

June 28th, 2009

Doane's Falls
Creative Commons License photo: Pear Biter

The BBC report that music bosses are considering incorporating music streaming into the Top 40. That would mean listening statistics from Spotify, Deezer and other top music streaming sites would be considered in calculating the most popular songs.

The Official UK Charts Company said it was “bound to” include streaming and subscription services at some point, but not for at least another year.

Because listeners do not pay per track – if at all – those plays would be likely to carry less weight than normal sales.

It’s a change which would totally shake up the charts.

At present, songs are considered for the charts at the point of sale. By considering music streaming, songs are considered at the point of use. It’s an important distinction. Take Pink Floyd – chances are not many people are buying Pink Floyd music at the moment: there are no new singles or albums being released. Yet, many people are listening to Pink Floyd at the moment. By shifting the focus from point of sale to point of use, there would be a huge change in the charts, benefiting popular artists who produce timeless music.

Mirror image
Creative Commons License photo: James Jordan

According to Martin Talbot, managing director of the Official Charts company, “Knowing what a stream is worth compared to a purchase of a download, for instance, is very difficult to identify at the moment, but that’s obviously going to be the next step,”.

This is going to be a big problem. Whatever weighting is assigned to streaming, it is going to be possible for people to manipulate the charts by incessantly streaming the same song. I remember when downloads were added to the chart: there was a big campaign to try and get The Wurzels into the charts. It never happened in the end: it took too many people to part with 99p for the prank to have worked. However, it’s not hard to convince a million people to stream a song from Spotify when it’s free. In fact, post a link to a song on Twitter and most people wouldn’t even know what the song is until after it loads. A Twitter meme can easily influence the charts.

The good news for consumers is that this is likely to increase the number of songs available for streaming. At present, there are big gaps in the catalogues of Spotify, Deezer, and other music streaming sites. Once streaming becomes part of the chart, I believe music companies will be much happier to open their catalogues to these sites. Because otherwise their competitors would have a huge advantage in the charts.

Spotify offers free streaming music; how does it compare to Deezer?

June 16th, 2009

We Love Spotify
Creative Commons License photo: Jon Åslund

About a year ago, I introduced Deezer to readers of this blog – one of the websites which pioneered the whole model of free streamed music – music which was advertising supported. Paul Ricard of Deezer summed up the streaming business model very concisely in an interview with this blog:

“free of charge and legally, all kinds of music, from rock to hip-hop, jazz, electro and world music… While at the same time, artists and rights owners receive a share of advertising revenue”

I listed Deezer as the number one website to listen to free music. But how have things changed in the year since? Is Deezer still top dog for streaming music?

One challenger comes in the form of Spotify. Unlike Deezer, you need to download a separate programme – you can’t tune in with just your web browser. The programme is obviously designed to resemble iTunes as closely as possible – it’s neat, fast and just works. Although it is annoying having to download an additional programme, it does allow Spotify to achieve things that Deezer can’t do with a browser-based website: for example multimedia keyboard support, Last.fm scrobbling and a spotify: protocol which allows you to directly link your friends to songs you like.

The sound quality on Spotify is fantastic. It sounds better than Deezer and the songs load more quickly too. But it does come at the cost of additional bandwidth. Spotify uses peer-to-peer technology. When your computer is on and Spotify is open, your computer is being used to share and distribute music to other Spotify users. If you’re on a capped internet package, that could get costly. From my own observations, it uploads at approx 1kbps so it probably won’t clog up the tubes though.

Hands in the air - in concert
Creative Commons License photo: marfis75

Spotify’s library contains 6 million tracks (3 million tracks for UK listeners). It’s a pretty decent library but there are some significant omissions such as Pink Floyd. There are songs available on Deezer but not available on Spotify; and vice versa.

Advertising. Spotify includes periodic audio adverts between songs as well as banner adverts within the programme. You wouldn’t think the audio adverts were any worse than listening to the radio – but they are. At least on the radio you have a variety of adverts. Grown men have been driven to insanity by hearing a message from “Jonathan from Spotify” several dozen times each working day. Again, and again. And again. Spotify also have technology that forces you to listen to the adverts. Don’t try muting your speakers or turning the volume down – it won’t work. Deezer features banner adverts on it’s website. They’re not intrusive at all – they won’t bother you when you’ve just got music on in the background.

Overall, Spotify is a very decent offering. It’s got a fairly good selection of music in a good quality and the programme is more pleasant to use than Deezer. But there are some significant downsides – the main one being repetitive adverts. Don’t let me understate just how much of a downside that is – advertising I can deal with, but not the same adverts every 10 minutes. The P2P nature of the programme is also controversial – both the BBC and Channel 4 have moved from P2P to browser for their video-on-demand offerings. It seems somehow strange to move from a browser-based offering in Deezer to a P2P-based offering in Spotify.

I’m personally still using Deezer as my primary on-demand music service, with Spotify as a backup for the songs which aren’t available in the Deezer library. Your own milage may vary. Let us know what you think.

Introducing Twittify – a Twitter & Spotify mash-up to share music in real time

May 23rd, 2009

I Put A Record On
Creative Commons License photo: pokpok313

Music has always been a social activity. People go to concerts to listen to music together and there was a day when teenagers would gather together just to listen to new tracks on the turntable!

With people now spending listening to the majority of music at their computer, this doesn’t really happen very much any more.

Twittify (requires Spotify) is an experiment to try and bring this shared music listening experience back to the computer. As the name suggests, it’s a web 2.0 style “mashup” which combines microblogging service Twitter and music listening service Spotify.

Twittify allows you to “follow” music in real time. It checks Twitter once a minute for a new song posted to the tag (e.g. #mgmt) or user (e.g. @khloplay) that you’re following. If it finds a new song, it’ll play the song in Spotify for you and everybody else who is simultaneously following that tag/user.

When might Twittify be useful?

  • You’re chatting to your friends about music in a chatroom/instant messenger. You’ve discovered some new songs which you want to share with your friend. Using Twittify, you can both enjoy listening to these tracks together. Using Twitter, you can both tweet songs with the same tag (e.g. #CarlAndDan). If you both use Twittify to “follow” #CarlAndDan and you’ll both hear these songs played on your computer.
  • Find out what other Twitter listeners are listening to on Spotify. For example by following #muse, you can see what other Muse fans are listening to.
  • You’re playing music at a party but you want to let your guests control the music that’s being played from their mobile phone. Run Twittify on your sound system and ask your guests to tweet a Spotify song to your Twitter account.

Try it out

in Concert - blue
Creative Commons License photo: marfis75

Try it out at the Twittify webpage. Send a tweet to the @khloplay account which includes the Spotify URI of a song (right click a song in Spotify to get the Spotify URI).

e.g. @khloplay spotify:track:6Z14gdQNMJenVFA4eqpS6M time to pretend by #mgmt – fav song

Limitations

  • Twittify can only check Twitter once a minute due to Twitter API limits. Hence there could be a gap of up to one minute between the song being sent to Twitter and it being played.
  • Twitter search doesn’t work perfectly all the time. Sometimes it doesn’t update straight away; sometimes not at all. I don’t know if this is a issue with Twitter or Twittify.
  • The interface of sending a spotify URI isn’t the most intuitive. Unfortunately Spotify doesn’t provide an API to turn an artist and track name into a Spotify URI so this information needs to be added elsewhere in the tweet for now.

Please remember that this is a very rough and ready “proof of concept”!

Got thoughts?

Send a tweet to @khlo or leave a comment here.

Microsoft Songsmith makes a song from your vocals

January 8th, 2009

N.
Creative Commons License photo: ValetheKid

Ever fancied writing a song but could never play an instrument?

Microsoft Research have released a programme called Songsmith. Songsmith records you singing into a computer microphone and automatically generates a musical melody to accompany it.

This is how Microsoft are marketing it:

Ever sing in the car? Maybe in the shower? You know who you are. Admit it, you like to sing, and you like music. Ever thought of writing your own music? Most people never get a chance to try… but we want to give everyone a piece of the songwriting experience, so we’ve developed Songsmith, an application that lets you create a complete song just by singing!

It’s a 98MB download. The free trial is fully-functional and lasts for six hours of use (measured as 6 hours whilst the program is running and active; not minimised). After that, it’s either 29 dollars or 29 euros to buy it.

What a cool programme!

Via Long Zheng.

Listening to music on your mobile phone

December 29th, 2008

With the credit crunch, we’re all trying to find ways to save money. Over the next few weeks, I hope to deliver a selection of credit crunch busting tips for the technology enthusiast.

iPhone
Creative Commons License photo: William Hook

In this series of posts, I will talk about how you can get yourself the best features of the Apple iPhone 3G without having to buy an iPhone 3G – a phone which is as well known for its high price as its speed and style.

    1. Fast and convenient internet access, on the move
    2. Music player (this post)
    3. Personal organiser features (calendar, to do list, etc.)
    4. Access to my email (Gmail and Microsoft Exchange) account on the go
    5. Google Maps on the go

      To recap, I have had a Sony Ericsson k750i for over two years which I’ve now “transformed” into a smartphone to access the internet, listen to music, organise my schedule and to stay in touch via e-mail.

      The Convergence of Mobile and Music

      For many years, there has been a convergence between mobile phones and portable music devices. Mobiles have gained all kinds of new multimedia features as operators have tried to cash in on our demand for entertainment on the move. Mobile phones have certainly come a long way since polyphonic ringtones – most modern mobile phones feature a MP3 player of some kind.

      headphones
      Creative Commons License photo: e-magic

      Portable music players such as the Apple iPod have been moving in the opposite direction. We started with Sony Walkmans and Creative MuVos which just played music. A modern music player will allow you to watch videos and play games and even access the internet.

      The big mystery for technology enthusiasts is why we now need both a mobile phone and a portable music player. The Apple iPhone is probably heralded as the best example of convergence between music and mobile and proves that one device can do both.

      No longer will any of us need to fit a music player in our left pocket, a mobile phone in our right and then struggle to find somewhere else for our keys.

      Your Mobile Plays Music Pretty Well

      The problem with the k750i is that it is limited to just 34MB of internal memory. For music, that’s pretty shoddy: you could just about fit one album on there if you squeezed the bitrate down. Luckily the k750i, and most modern phones, will allow you to expand the amount of memory by purchasing additional cards.

      And good news: memory is dirt cheap. a 4GB Memory Stick Duo for Sony Ericsson mobiles costs just £13. That’ll get you 1,000 songs.

      For a direct comparison, an iPod Nano 8GB costs close to £100. The equivalent amount of memory costs £30 as a memory stick duo or under £13 as a Micro SD card. Obviously, check the type of memory which your phone takes. The Memory Sticks tend to be pretty expensive compared to micro SD, but are still a lot cheaper than buying a music player with the same capacity.

      in Concert - blue
      Creative Commons License photo: marfis75

      Where can I get music in the MP3 format?

      The Amazon MP3 store gets my recommendation for purchasing music in the MP3 format. Albums are available from £3 and individual songs from 59p.

      With albums costing £8.99 and individual songs at 79p at iTunes, there are huge cost savings from downloading your music from Amazon MP3. As an additional benefit, your music isn’t encumbered by Apple’s DRM. Oh, and you get music at 256kbps – double the bitrate of iTunes. Not bad at all.

      Conclusions

      • It is more than likely that your current mobile phone will play MP3s
      • You may need to increase the amount of memory on your device by purchasing extra memory, but memory is very cheap these days
      • You can save a lot more money by avoiding iTunes and downloading your music from Amazon MP3. You also benefit from better quality music, unencumbered by DRM

      Free MP3 Download Albums from Amazon.co.uk

      December 25th, 2008


      Merry Christmas everybody! Just to share with you a fantastic freebie, Amazon.co.uk are offering every customer a free MP3 album download on Christmas Day and Boxing Day 2008. Go to the Amazon MP3 Store to get your festive freebie.

      These are good big name albums from artists such as The Killers, Leona Lewis, Guns N’ Roses and The Ting Tings.

      My album choices from the free albums (what I’m currently listening to):

      Unfortunately my musical recommendations are slightly biased from the fact I have seen all the listed bands perform live! So do have a full look down the list of albums available.

      You can get more other albums for £3 a piece – not bad at all. Definitely compares very favourably against iTunes price wise and the music is encoded at 256kbps without DRM which means you are free to listen to the music as you please. Given music can be quite a large expenditure for many young people, this could be a great way to beat the credit crunch.

      Update: You’ll still need to provide credit and debit card information to Amazon. I believe Amazon will charge you for the album and then refund you.

      Thanks to Richard for the tip :)

      A Chat With David Schwartz, Music Search Engine, Jogli CEO

      November 19th, 2008

      Jogli is a search engine and media player for free music. It claims to have 12 million albums and 500 million songs, all available for listening in a clean and tidy interface. It’s certainly an impressive index and you’ll probably find most of the music you’re looking for.

      Although Jogli crawls the web for music, the vast majority of content comes from YouTube. That has both blessings and shortcomings: Because it piggybacks on YouTube, Jogli doesn’t have to pay royalties or individually sign agreements with media companies. This means Jogli can offer more music. The downside is that some videos are “broken” (no longer exist), of a poor quality or misindexed.

      I caught up with the Jogli CEO David Schwartz. I asked him about Jogli, the future of music on the web and the mobile and how he believes Jogli differs from other similar sites.

      First of all, could you tell us a little bit about Jogli?

      Jogli is a search engine for music. It scans the internet for existing music and music video clips, and then indexes the music in order to enable an easy and efficient search. As a result, users have access to huge free inventory of music.

      Users can search and listen to any desired album (out of 12 million albums!), music video clips, individual tracks, and other users’ playlists. They can also view the lyrics, artists’ bios, image galleries, etc.

      The story behind Jogli It’s basically fulfilling a personal dream – I wanted to make my dream of going to a web site or a music shop and get all the music I like for free – true. I believe that Jogli does to music what Google did to the internet – you want a web site, you go to Google, search for it – and there it is. Well, it’s the same with music now – you go to Jogli, you search for the music you want – and there it is – just click and play.

      “All the music in the world is going to be available for free on any mobile platform in less then a year.”

      Are the days of people going out to buy CDs or paying for a song on iTunes are behind us? What, do you feel, is the best way of giving people access to music whilst ensuring artists are properly compensated for their work?

      Well, as for buying CDs – yes, that’s ancient history these days. iTunes and other on line music shops – well, at my humble opinion, they will die soon enough. My belief is that as all the music is going to be available for free on the web (99% of it is available already!) and music search engines, like Jogli, will allow immediate access to it.

      While it’s easy to tell how people are going to access music, it’s a bit harder to predict how artists are going to make money of it, and how the music industry is going to look.

      My personal guess is:

      1. Web sites that broadcast music (like YouTube) will share with artists their revenues on advertisements.
      2. It’s going to be the end of traditional music labels, radio stations and other conservative music institutions
      3. We are going to see much more young, revolutionary and independent music out there. As artists will no longer need mediators like labels, and will be able to access their audience directly through the web (we already see it happening in MySpace, YouTube and Jogli)
      4. We are going to see less “super mega stars” like Madonna, as the web is less centralistic then traditional industries.

      We’ve seen people streaming Pandora internet radio to their iPhones. Nokia has launched their “Comes With Music” phones where customers have access to free music downloads for 12 months. How do you think the convergence between music and mobile will develop in the future and how will music websites such as Jogli be a part of this?

      All the music in the world is going to be available for free on any mobile platform in less then a year. We in Jogli are already working on extending our web sites to Nokia devices, iPhone and Android. Think about it – your phone, which is also you portable music player, is going to allow you access to millions of albums and hundred of millions of songs! Just click and play! – Its amazing!

      “Jogli allows people to listen to whole albums, play personal “MTV” channels though its radio feature, gives access to the whole lyrics”

      Do you feel the music industry has been receptive to working with startups and smaller music websites? How does a small company compete in the world of large record and media companies making million dollar deals?

      Well, traditional music industry knows it’s a matter of life and death for them – they have to get a foot in the web door. As a result, the “traditional industry” became very involved. Just a few examples – partnerships with YouTube, the purchase of last.fm and the eagerness to invest money in Jogli (we got several investment propositions from the traditional music industry).

      Yet- the current financial crisis may change all that…

      With Jogli’s content coming primarily from Google’s YouTube service, how do you feel Jogli provides additional “value added” in this area?

      Music experience is far more then listening to one song (which YouTube does great). Jogli allows people to listen to whole albums, play personal “MTV” channels though its radio feature, gives access to the whole lyrics – and much more. We provide a full and exciting music experience.

      By the way – Youtube helped us and supported us amazingly. And we are grateful. These guys are cool.

      How does Jogli deal with YouTube content which is mistagged, mislabelled or of a poor quality?

      We have algorithms designed to find the best option for each song. This algorithm uses not only textual meta data (such as file name, description, number of views, etc.) but also the actual file, its quality and its size.

      Naturally, we don’t have 100% success (though we are not so far!). When you encounter bad quality or wrong result you can click “get alternatives for this song”, then you will get a list of options to choose from. We are aggregating these choices to improve the results.

      “We intend to…provide the largest offering of music and give our users the best music experience existing.”

      What do you feel differentiates Jogli from the rest of the crowd – the music websites such as Deezer, MySpace and Last.fm?

      First of all – Jogli has much more music – 12 million albums and 500 million songs, secondly- the experience we offer is more cool – as we offer much more then the music only.

      What direction do you see Jogli going in, in the future?

      In the very near future we are going to launch a widget that will allow anyone to place any albums or playlists in their web pages and blogs. Then – expand to mobile.

      For the long term – Our mission is to be the best and most popular music web site in the world – no less. We intend to accomplish this by remaining 100% free, provide the largest offering of music and give our users the best music experience existing.

      Finally, what are you listening to at the moment?

      Bob Marley – Legend (-;

       

      A huge thank you to David for taking the time to speak to Cow’s Blog. On behalf of our entire community, I’d like to wish David all the best of luck with Jogli. I am sure we are all very interested in seeing which direction Jogli goes in!

      I’d love to know how you listen to music and how you think the way that we interact with music will change over the coming years. Drop us a comment or an email!

      Next »