<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Office 2007 Beta 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cow.neondragon.net/index.php/1079-Office-2007-Beta-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cow.neondragon.net/index.php/1079-Office-2007-Beta-2</link>
	<description>Helping you to get the most out of modern technology and communications since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:38:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opher</title>
		<link>http://cow.neondragon.net/index.php/1079-Office-2007-Beta-2/comment-page-1#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>Opher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-659</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I remember the times of Office 2000, it was quite a nifty package, fast and efficient. When I upgraded to 2003 I certainly noticed a difference in loading time, but the extra features are worth it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Apparently 2007 has slower loading times than 2003, so its not that bad.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember the times of Office 2000, it was quite a nifty package, fast and efficient. When I upgraded to 2003 I certainly noticed a difference in loading time, but the extra features are worth it.</p>
<p>Apparently 2007 has slower loading times than 2003, so its not that bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khlo</title>
		<link>http://cow.neondragon.net/index.php/1079-Office-2007-Beta-2/comment-page-1#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>Khlo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-660</guid>
		<description>Unscientific benchmark but I opened up Word 2000 - it took approx 4 seconds. Word 2007 took around 12 seconds.&lt;br /&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unscientific benchmark but I opened up Word 2000 &#8211; it took approx 4 seconds. Word 2007 took around 12 seconds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opher</title>
		<link>http://cow.neondragon.net/index.php/1079-Office-2007-Beta-2/comment-page-1#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>Opher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-661</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just finished installing. I was made to reboot PC, but it is definately alot faster than 2003.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And the new UI is imho far more better and asthetically pleasing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However when I firsted opened the program I though I was on a Mac due to the curvy corners. :(&#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Overall - I LOVE IT!&#160;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just finished installing. I was made to reboot PC, but it is definately alot faster than 2003.</p>
<p>And the new UI is imho far more better and asthetically pleasing.</p>
<p>However when I firsted opened the program I though I was on a Mac due to the curvy corners. <img src='http://cow.neondragon.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> &nbsp;</p>
<p>Overall &#8211; I LOVE IT!&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

